WAEC Nigeria Chief, Amos Dangut
WAEC examination result delay not arbitrary, Council insists amid viral claims of emotional distress over the withheld result.
A Cry for Help That Went Viral
In an age where education shapes futures and exam results open doors, even the slightest delay in certificate processing can spark waves of anxiety.
This reality was dramatically illustrated when a distressed mother took to the media to demand the release of her son’s withheld WAEC result,
citing depression and emotional instability as direct consequences of the delay.
Her public plea rapidly went viral, prompting heated reactions across Nigeria’s social and educational communities.
In the emotional report titled “Release My Son’s WAEC Certificate Now, He’s Slipping Into Depression”,
the mother narrated how her son, a 2023 WASSCE candidate,
has been locked out of university admissions and sunk into depression due to his yet-to-be-released result.
The story resonated with thousands, many of whom called for urgent reforms in how examination bodies handle such sensitive cases.
However, the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) quickly responded to the viral narrative,
issuing a formal statement to refute the claims and clarify its policies on result withholding.
According to WAEC, the delay was not arbitrary but anchored on due process, specifically tied to examination malpractice investigations.
The Viral Outcry and Its Impact
In Nigeria, WAEC certificates are not just a rite of passage; they are gatekeepers to opportunity.
For many families, the WASSCE result is a milestone that determines whether their children proceed to higher education or remain stuck in academic limbo.
So when a result is withheld especially without clear communication it creates a psychological and social ripple effect.
The mother’s account was heartbreaking:
her son reportedly cried himself to sleep, avoided social activities,
and showed signs of clinical depression due to the uncertainty surrounding his academic status.
She accused WAEC of emotional neglect and called on government authorities to intervene.
Public sympathy was swift. On social media,
hashtags like #ReleaseWAECResult and #JusticeForStudents began trending,
with many parents sharing similar experiences of prolonged silence after their wards’ results were held back.
The incident sparked nationwide conversations on mental health, institutional accountability,
and the need for empathetic governance in education.
WAEC’s Official Response: Setting the Record Straight
In a press statement issued by Mrs. Moyosola Adesina, Acting Head of Public Affairs for WAEC Nigeria,
the Council categorically denied the accusation of negligence.
According to the statement, results are never withheld without valid reasons.
“The Council does not withhold candidate results without cause,” Adesina emphasized.
“Only in cases where credible evidence of examination malpractice or other irregularities are reported do we suspend result issuance pending investigations.”
WAEC stressed that it is a law-abiding institution committed to upholding educational standards while maintaining fairness.
The decision to withhold a candidate’s result, the Council noted, is never made arbitrarily or with malicious intent.
“We are deeply concerned about the emotional impact on students, but we must also protect the integrity of our examinations,” the Council stated.
Understanding WAEC’s Withholding Policy
To put things into perspective, WAEC’s policy on withholding results is governed by internal rules and external legal frameworks.
Once an examination is concluded, scripts are scrutinized for signs of malpractice this includes identical answers,
invigilator reports, CCTV footage (where available), and candidate behavior.
If suspicion arises, the candidate’s result is flagged and placed on hold while an internal committee conducts an investigation.
During this period, the candidate is notified usually via the school or WAEC’s Malpractice Notification Portal and given a chance to respond to the allegations.
WAEC insists this process is transparent and widely communicated. Press releases, social media updates,
and pre-exam briefings are all part of the Council’s strategy to ensure that both candidates and guardians are aware of the procedure.
“We do not operate in secrecy,” Adesina added. “Our channels of communication are open, and the procedures are made clear at every stage of the exam cycle.”
Parents Push Back: Where’s the Communication?
Despite WAEC’s detailed explanation, many parents remain unconvinced.
They argue that while procedures may exist on paper, in practice, families are often left in the dark.
In the viral case, the mother insists that neither she nor her son received any formal notice of alleged malpractice.
“We’ve checked the portal over and over. Nothing is there.
If there is a case against my child, they should write to us directly,” she said in a follow-up interview.
This disconnect between WAEC’s stated protocols and the user experience of affected families is now fueling wider calls for reform.
Some parents have suggested the creation of a dedicated liaison unit within WAEC to provide real-time case updates and emotional support to affected students.
The Mental Health Dimension
Mental health professionals have also weighed in, emphasizing the severe psychological toll that prolonged academic uncertainty can have on adolescents.
Dr. Ngozi Ukonu, a Lagos-based child psychologist, noted that delayed academic progress can trigger anxiety,
loss of self-worth, and in extreme cases, suicidal thoughts.
“Teenagers are particularly vulnerable because they tie their identity to academic success,” she explained.
“Institutions must be sensitive to this dynamic.”
Dr. Ukonu recommends that examination bodies like WAEC collaborate with school counselors to provide psychosocial support for students whose results are withheld.
Balancing Integrity with Empathy
The controversy has placed WAEC at a moral crossroads:
how can it enforce academic integrity without appearing insensitive to the psychological impact of its decisions?
WAEC’s current response mechanism is largely administrative letters, portals, and press statements.
However, education stakeholders argue that in a digital age where narratives can spiral within hours,
the Council needs to invest in more proactive and compassionate communication strategies.
Some experts propose the integration of human resource officers trained in emotional intelligence into WAEC’s result management team.
Others advocate for a hybrid system where automated updates are backed by human interactions,
especially in emotionally charged cases involving teenagers.
Broader Educational Implications
This episode has also reignited debates about the structure of Nigeria’s secondary education assessment system.
Should one exam body wield so much influence over students’ futures?
Should there be appeal boards or ombudsman offices independent of WAEC to handle result disputes?
Educational policy analyst Mr. Patrick Onuche suggests Nigeria needs to decentralize high-stakes testing to prevent emotional fallout from bureaucratic bottlenecks.
“When a single body controls access to higher education,
even a minor administrative issue can become life-altering for families,” Onuche said.
“We must diversify our systems and build in more humane safety nets.”
Read Also:
- Nigerian tech innovation: Young Innovators Disrupt the Market
- WAEC Apologises for Delay in Exam to Avert Paper Leakage
- WAEC Exam Failure in Darkness Sparks National Outrage
Lessons from Other Countries
Globally, examination bodies face similar challenges, but many have adopted best practices to mitigate emotional distress.
In the UK, for example, students can appeal their GCSE or A-level results through a formalized and time-bound process,
with emotional support services embedded in schools.
In Ghana, WAEC’s counterpart has introduced a digital helpdesk where candidates can chat with live agents regarding their results and receive counseling referrals.
Nigeria’s WAEC arm may benefit from adapting such models to local contexts.
WAEC’s Final Word and Future Promise
Amid the backlash, WAEC has reiterated its commitment to transparency, fairness, and continuous improvement.
In its concluding remarks, the Council stated:
“As a world-class examining body, WAEC remains committed to enhancing the quality of assessments while protecting the educational interests of all its stakeholders.”
The Council hinted at ongoing upgrades to its communication systems,
including a mobile app that would allow candidates to track the status of their results in real time, receive notifications, and lodge complaints.
Restoring Trust Through Reform
The WAEC examination result delay controversy is more than a bureaucratic incident it’s a human story that exposes the emotional cost of institutional rigidity.
While WAEC’s position is grounded in the need to uphold academic standards,
the public expects more humane engagement, especially when the lives of young people hang in the balance.
As Nigeria continues to evolve its education system, the balance between accountability and compassion must become a central tenet.
The lesson here is clear: process matters, but people matter more.
Have you or someone you know experienced a delay in examination result processing?
What reforms would you like to see WAEC implement?
Share your thoughts in the comments or tag us on social media using #WAECReformNow.
Your voice could shape the future of assessment in Nigeria.
About The Author
