United States President Donald Trump has stirred controversy with his latest remarks on birthright citizenship, arguing that the 14th Amendment was never intended to grant automatic citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump claimed that the original purpose of the amendment was to ensure citizenship for former slaves, not what he described as “modern-day gate-crashers.”
“The 14th Amendment Right to American Citizenship never had anything to do with modern-day ‘gate-crashers,’ illegal immigrants who break the law by being in our country.
It had everything to do with granting citizenship to former slaves,” Trump wrote.
Executive Order Sparks Legal Battle
Since his inauguration last month, Trump has moved aggressively on immigration policy, signing an executive order to end birthright citizenship for children born to undocumented parents.
However, the order has been met with strong legal resistance.
On Thursday, Federal Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston blocked the executive order, following similar rulings from judges in Seattle, Maryland, and New Hampshire.
This legal challenge underscores the deep divide over immigration policies in the U.S.
Public Reaction and Political Ramifications
Trump’s comments have ignited heated discussions among legal experts, political analysts, and civil rights advocates.
While his supporters view the move as a necessary step to curb illegal immigration, critics argue that it undermines constitutional rights and longstanding American values.
As the debate unfolds, legal battles are expected to continue, shaping the future of immigration laws in the U.S.
What’s Next?
With multiple court rulings blocking the birthright citizenship ban, the matter may eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court, setting the stage for a historic legal showdown.
Leave a Reply