state assembly secret sanctions
State assembly secret sanctions practices undermine democratic accountability as political loyalty overrides legislative independence in Nigerian state parliaments.
Silencing Dissent in Plain Sight
The political theatre within Nigeria’s state assemblies often draws public attention only when chaos erupts physical altercations, mass suspensions, or walkouts.
However, a more covert system has gained traction over time, one not widely discussed or publicly acknowledged: state assembly secret sanctions.
These informal disciplinary measures, cloaked in procedural legitimacy, are increasingly used to suppress dissent, enforce party loyalty, and consolidate power.
The Strategy of Silencing
Recent events in Benue State where lawmakers faced suspension, then selective reinstatement based on written apologies highlight a growing pattern.
Benue is not an isolated case.
Across various Nigerian states, elected officials increasingly face the threat of silent punishment whenever their positions clash with party lines or leadership preferences.
This investigation exposes the quiet erosion of legislative independence across Nigeria’s federating units.
How Secret Sanctions Work
In theory, legislative bodies embody democratic expression. In practice, Nigerian state assemblies function under mechanisms that limit genuine representation.
Secret sanctions typically do not appear in House Rules. Instead, they manifest informally through a variety of means:
Leadership denies lawmakers access to constituency project funds.
Dissenters are reassigned to less influential committees.
Suspended lawmakers face humiliation during plenary sessions.
Apology letters are demanded for reinstatement.
These practices silence even the most vocal legislators. They create a culture of conformity, leaving the assembly a symbolic institution instead of a functioning legislative body.
Case Study: Benue State Assembly Drama
In March 2025, the Benue State House of Assembly suspended thirteen lawmakers.
These lawmakers had publicly opposed the resolution recommending the suspension of Chief Judge Maurice Ikpambese.
Although the official reason cited insubordination, insiders confirm deeper political tensions were at play.
Three months later, only six lawmakers were reinstated. They had submitted apology letters, which the assembly accepted.
The other seven remain suspended for refusing to follow suit.
A legislative staffer remarked, “The apology isn’t about reconciliation. It’s a demand for total loyalty.”
Constituents of these suspended lawmakers now lack representation, an injustice that contradicts democratic norms.
This situation worsens due to the absence of neutral oversight bodies. No independent disciplinary panel reviews infractions.
The speaker usually aligned with the state governor controls all disciplinary processes.
This centralization of authority transforms the legislature into a rubber-stamp entity.
Beyond Benue: A National Pattern Emerges
Benue is not alone. Across other Nigerian states, similar trends continue:
Rivers State: Security officers physically blocked dissenters from entering the Assembly.
Imo State: Lawmakers lost key committee posts for challenging the executive.
Ekiti State: Leaked audio revealed threats against dissenting legislators.
Cross River State: Lawmakers opposing executive nominees were sidelined.
Abia State: Minority party members were excluded from key deliberations.
These instances point to a widespread tactic. Though unofficial, these sanctions are devastatingly effective.
They deter dissent while keeping the public in the dark. Even more troubling, some lawmakers report harassment and pressure to defect to the ruling party.
Experts Warn of Democratic Decline
Governance analysts say unchecked sanctions are sabotaging democratic structures.
Prof. Joseph Enakeme of the University of Ibadan observed, “Assemblies have become echo chambers. When loyalty replaces logic, democracy loses its essence.”
Dr. Halima Musa, a political ethicist, stated, “Sanctions must follow due process. Informal punishments serve only political interests.”
Political analyst Ayo Olatunji echoed, “Legislators must be watchdogs. If they fear to act, accountability fails. This affects budgeting, ministry oversight, and service delivery.”
What It Means for Citizens
When lawmakers fall silent or inactive due to secret sanctions, the people suffer. Communities lose their voice in policy debates. Local petitions go unaddressed.
In Gboko, a resident complained, “Our representative hasn’t spoken for months. We feel abandoned.”
Moreover, in Kogi and Zamfara, delayed infrastructure and stagnant community projects show the real-world impact of suspended representation.
Democracy is meant to serve the people. When internal politics overrides public interest, governance falters.
Online Response: Digital Voices Rise
Social media platforms continue to amplify citizen outrage. Hashtags like #BenueSuspensions and #LegislativeSilencing have trended widely.
One X user (formerly Twitter) posted, “Say sorry or stay silent? That’s not democracy.”
Civic tech groups now host online polls and digital forums. A recent poll found that 72% of Nigerians disapprove of punishing lawmakers for political dissent.
These forums also bring together legal experts and civil society actors who discuss legislative integrity and propose reforms.
Legal Loopholes Fuel Abuse
Although the Nigerian Constitution outlines a separation of powers, it fails to curb internal abuses in state assemblies.
Legal expert Barr. Uchechukwu Anene noted, “The Constitution grants self-regulation rights to state houses.
Unfortunately, this is abused due to lack of clear checks.”
Court cases challenging unlawful suspensions take years, often concluding after the lawmakers’ tenures have ended.
In many situations, this delayed justice offers little redress.
Journalism and the Risk of Reprisal
Journalists who investigate secret sanctions face threats, harassment, or legal intimidation.
In Delta State, two reporters were detained after leaking memos that detailed sanction strategies.
Their arrest drew criticism from press freedom groups across West Africa.
Media advocate Funke Obafemi warned, “This is an assault on press freedom and democratic transparency.”
Silencing the press limits public awareness and enables unchecked abuse within legislative institutions.
Reforming the System: Steps Forward
To restore assembly credibility, Nigeria must adopt the following reforms:
Clear guidelines for internal disciplinary action.
Creation of independent ethics committees.
Constituent protections to ensure representation.
Regular publication of legislative attendance and votes.
Legal shields for journalists and whistleblowers.
Furthermore, civil society should continue its pressure through litigation, advocacy, and civic education.
Read Also:
- Benue Youths Protest Killings Amid Outrage
- Northern Governors Demand Federal Government Action on Security
Restore Integrity in Representation
The prevalence of state assembly secret sanctions highlights a crisis in legislative ethics.
Discipline must never become a weapon. The practice of forcing lawmakers into silence through covert tactics represents a betrayal of democracy.
The Nigerian public must act demand transparency, speak out against repression, and hold legislators accountable.
Without proactive engagement, democracy remains at risk.
Is your lawmaker facing unfair sanctions? Report your concerns to [email protected] or use #StateAssemblyWatch on X. Join the push for open, accountable governance today.
About The Author
