Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s trial begins in Abuja with massive support from Ezekwesili and Yesufu. Explore court charges and implications.
A Political Storm Lands in Court: Natasha Faces the Nation
On Thursday, June 19, 2025, the typically calm High Court in Maitama buzzed with tension.
Journalists jostled for position, security officers stood alert, and murmurs filled the air. All attention was on one woman Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.
Accused of defamation, the suspended senator from Kogi Central arrived in court under the weight of serious allegations.
Her appearance marked not just a legal process but a moment of reckoning for Nigeria’s democracy.
She wasn’t alone. Sitting prominently in the gallery were two of Nigeria’s most respected activists Dr. Oby Ezekwesili and Aisha Yesufu.
Their presence underscored the gravity of the situation and signaled a powerful show of solidarity.
From Politics to Prosecution: Why Natasha Stands Accused
The trial stems from an April 3 appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today, where Natasha accused Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi Governor Yahaya Bello of plotting her assassination.
These weren’t vague allegations. She spoke with clarity and confidence, naming names on national television.
That interview now forms the backbone of a three-count criminal charge (CR/297/25) filed by the Federal Government.
The government is charging Natasha under Section 391 of the Penal Code, which deals with reputational harm.
If convicted, she could face fines or even imprisonment under Section 392.
Yet, the case has sparked broader debates about whether this is a quest for justice or a politically motivated attack.
Ezekwesili and Yesufu: Icons of Resistance Step In
When the trial began, the presence of Dr. Oby Ezekwesili and Aisha Yesufu wasn’t just symbolic.
It represented a statement. Both women have long histories of challenging oppressive systems and supporting victims of political targeting.
Ezekwesili, co-founder of the Bring Back Our Girls movement, has often stood up for accountability in government.
Yesufu, known for her fiery activism during the End SARS protests, remains one of Nigeria’s loudest voices for justice.
Their attendance challenged the perception that Natasha was isolated. In fact, it proved the opposite:
powerful women were rallying behind her, demanding fairness in a justice system often criticized for bias.
“This is about power and its abuse,” Yesufu said outside the court. “And it’s about the right to speak without fear.”
Inside the Courtroom: A Day of Intensity
The courtroom scene was electric. Natasha arrived at 10:27 a.m., accompanied by her husband and legal counsel.
Armed officers ensured order while reporters filled the press gallery.
At 11:00 a.m., proceedings began under Justice Chizoba Orji.
As the charges were read, Natasha remained composed. When asked for her plea, she answered firmly: “Not guilty.”
This defiant stance only deepened public interest, especially given the personalities involved and the political context.
Political Backdrop: Senate Drama and the Fallout
Natasha’s troubles didn’t start with that interview. They go back to a February 20 Senate session when she protested her seat’s sudden relocation.
Senate President Akpabio dismissed her repeatedly, triggering a tense exchange.
Days later, she was summoned by the Senate’s Ethics Committee. By March, she faced a six-month suspension.
Then came the twist. In another interview, Natasha claimed Akpabio had made “unwanted advances” toward her and that her resistance led to persecution.
This bombshell transformed a legislative disagreement into a scandal of national proportions.
The Charges Explained: What’s Being Said and What’s Missing
The charge sheet accuses Natasha of deliberately damaging reputations.
However, it offers little context or counter-evidence.
Critics argue that it sidesteps her serious allegations and focuses solely on punishment.
Among the witnesses are Akpabio and Yahaya Bello.
Investigating officers Maya Iliya and Abdulhafiz Garba, as well as Senator Asuquo Ekpenyong and citizen Sandra Duru, are also listed.
Yet, glaring omissions raise red flags. The accused figures never issued formal denials prior to the case.
No official investigations into the assassination claims were made public. These gaps fuel the perception of political targeting.
Women in Politics: Still Fighting for Fairness
Natasha’s case has reignited a vital conversation: do female politicians in Nigeria face harsher treatment when they challenge authority?
According to Professor Habiba Ahmed of the University of Abuja, “There’s a disturbing trend of silencing powerful women.
Natasha’s experience mirrors others who dared to speak out.”
Online reactions have been swift. Hashtags like #JusticeForNatasha and #WomenInPower trended nationally.
Civic groups hosted digital town halls, and plans for a women-led solidarity march are underway.
Clearly, this case is no longer just legal it’s deeply symbolic.
What Lies Ahead: Key Court Dates and Legal Strategy
The Federal High Court will rule on June 27, 2025, on the legality of Natasha’s Senate suspension.
Opinions among legal experts vary. While some argue that the Senate acted within its rights, others claim the move violated her constitutional protections.
Natasha’s defense team plans to file a motion to dismiss the defamation charges entirely.
Their central argument? That her statements were expressions of free speech, protected under the Nigerian Constitution.
Should the motion fail, a full trial is expected potentially drawing international attention.
Read Also:
- Senator Natasha’s defamation case Shakes Nigeria
- Senate Contempt Showdown: Akpabio vs. Natasha Grips Nigeria Ahead of May 13 Court Ruling
- Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Stands Her Ground
Beyond the Court: What This Trial Means for Nigeria
More than anything, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s trial tests the strength of Nigerian democracy.
Are we a nation that upholds free speech and protects whistleblowers? Or are we becoming a country where speaking out invites political punishment?
For many, Natasha has become a symbol not just of defiance, but of what it means to challenge a system that often resists accountability.
Her trial, watched closely at home and abroad, may define the trajectory of women’s political participation for years to come.
Your Voice Matters:
Do you see Natasha’s trial as a fair legal process or a political witch-hunt?
Let us know by tagging @NIGPOST and using #NatashaTrialWatch.
About The Author
